皇冠官网(www.huangguan.us)是皇冠体育官方信用网线上直营平台。皇冠官网开放信用网和现金网代理申请、信用网和现金网会员注册、线上充值线上投注、线上提现、皇冠官方APP下载等业务。

首页体育正文

足球博彩app(www.hg108.vip):A ray of hope in Malaysia\u2019s Constitution

admin2022-08-315

新2手机管理端网址www.99cx.vip)实时更新发布最新最快最有效的新2手机管理端网址,包括新2手机网址,新2备用网址,皇冠最新网址,新2足球网址,新2网址大全。

IT was a devastating day for all the Malaysian mothers who sought citizenship for their children who were born outside Malaysia via the operation of law. The Court of Appeal overturned the High Court’s decision with a majority of 2-1.

As reported, judge Kamaludin Md Said ruled that the High Court had erred in the decision by equating the word “father” to also mean “mother” under part II of the second schedule of the Federal Constitution, read with article 14(1)(b) of the Constitution.

The contention was that the word “father” here must be interpreted as it is. It must retain the original meaning of what was intended by the Federal Constitution.

However, the dissenting judgment by judge S. Nantha Balan said the interpretation in a harmonious manner was correct. In which, interpreting the citizenship clause in a rigid manner would only cause conflict as to the bloodline (jus sanguinis).

Malaysia follows constitutional supremacy, as stated in the case of Ah Tian v Government of Malaysia. As such, the court cannot with its own whims and fancies interpret something that is not in the Federal Constitution.

The Federal Constitution is not subjected to the same limitations that apply to ordinary law where the intention of the drafter takes precedence.

The hallmark of constitutionalism is only to administer what is being fair and just, and its limitations begin with the basic structure doctrine.

,

足球博彩appwww.hg108.vip)是皇冠体育官网线上直营平台。足球博彩app面向亚太地区招募代理,开放皇冠信用网代理申请、皇冠现金网代理会员开户等业务。足球博彩app可下载皇冠官方APP,皇冠APP包括皇冠体育最新代理登录线路、皇冠体育最新会员登录线路。

,

In interpreting the law, there are two ways – one is clear-cut provisions and a prismatic approach, which allows the court to lift the veil in the context of the provision with its proper meaning without changing or creating a new provision altogether.

The problem here again lies in the Constitution itself. Thus, the only way is to amend the Federal Constitution under part II of the second schedule, by replacing the word “father” with “parents”.

This gives rights to both mother and father in conferring their citizenship to their children.

To grant citizenship or not to grant citizenship has always been a conundrum.

However, as mentioned in the previous article, the CCH case has shown how a conundrum can be overcome, but this again is confined to a case-to-case basis.

So can this, too, be amended and passed, as how the anti-party hopping bill was approved with a more than two-thirds majority by parliament? – August 6, 2022.

* Matilda George reads The Malaysian Insight.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。

网友评论

1条评论
  • 2022-08-31 23:32:05

    就像欧洲中世纪城堡制作盛行一样,天守阁出现在日本战国时代中期,在安土桃山时代得到了生长,险些每个封建领主的城中都有天守阁作为主体修建。最郁勃的时期日本天下有200多座封建城池,日本曾经各处都是巨细天守城。我只是个打酱油的。